Firebird Journal

Survival and Renewal in the Anthropocene

Firebird Journal Pheonix Image

Helping Gen-R revive the planet

Photo by Vincent M.A. Janssen on

What can today’s adults do to help set the stage for a future Green Revolution?

In the introductory column to this series, I explained the concept of Gen-R — the generation comprised of today’s youth (people under 25 in 2020) who will be tasked with R-eviving, R-epairing, and R-enewing the planet. I pointed out that young people form the largest portion of the planet’s population (33%) and they will reach voting age and begin to take over the workings of commerce and government in the near future. Unfortunately, they also will be confronted with the immense challenge of saving the planet from humanity, and humanity from itself — a challenge which the generations preceding them have failed to meet.

To “save the planet,” Gen-R will have to foment what I called a “Green Transformation,” changing the entire world’s economic and consumption patterns, accompanied by a phased reduction of global population and the democratization of wealth. Nothing less will address the combined global threats of climate change and environmental devastation in the two to three-decade horizon that remains before salvaging civilization, and much of the planet, becomes unachievable.

I also argued that “It is virtually impossible for today’s adults, the people currently in power, to implement these changes: they are too invested materially and psychologically to make more than modest revisions [to the system].” Our continuing failure to take anything close to the necessary measures to address the climate crisis bears me out.

So, does that mean that anyone over, say, 25, is off the hook for fighting to save the planet?


Aside from the fact that such a moral capitulation is unacceptable, many of those who are currently in their 40s or 50s could still live through the worst, or close to the worst, of the coming environmental collapse — that is, live through it or die from it. We must remain engaged in the struggle, even though we might not see the outcome — whether it’s planetary revitalization or eco-apocalypse — for decades or even during some people’s lifetimes.

But as today’s adults put their past failures behind us (as we must), we need to assess where our efforts will be most productive in the coming struggle for positive change. Understanding that we have recently entered a two-decade period in which our fate will be decided — that’s a long campaign — we need to marshal our individual and collective resources to have greatest effect.

Essentially, I believe, our best investment is in today’s youth climate movements such as the global Strike for Climate (Greta Thunberg) and our own U.S. Sunrise Movement. As the battle warms up, it is today’s youth who have the energy, freedom from entanglements and investments in the status quo and ultimately the numbers to bring about change.

For example, while some older people are willing to “put their bodies on the line” and be arrested for civil disobedience during climate actions against fossil-fuel installations and government entities, most are not: they’ve got kids, mortgages, complex social commitments and assorted inhibitions. And because of those obligations, they often lack the fresh perspective. — and refreshing directness — that youth can bring to the bargaining table.

However, also in concert with those obligations, society’s adults have resources that young people typically lack: money, connections, a degree of influence. (They could also have wisdom to share — if and when they are asked to do so.) Today’s adults, and the youth they’ve spawned, could be a match made in heaven — or on earth — if the adults are willing to take the right approach.

What’s the right approach? They must relinquish a great deal of their control and trust young people to understand and articulate the problems, while supporting their goals and, so long as they remain nonviolent, their means of attaining those goals. 

How can we go about this? Start by listening. Is Greta Thunberg’s assessment of the climate crisis correct? It’s far more accurate than most, in my opinion. Are the measures sought by the Sunrise Movement the way forward? 

Let’s find out at our ecological house.

Editor’s Note: A version of this article appeared previously in other publications as part of an ongoing series called “Your Ecological House,” written by Philip S. Wenz, the publisher of Firebird Journal.


Share on Social:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us...

Follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. (We will never share or sell your email address.)


Books by Philip S. Wenz

Your Ecological House is a homeowner and designer’s guide to creating a “home ecosystem,” an integrated habitat that conserves and produces energy, reduces waste and produces food and other goods.

This upcoming book discussed three possible futures — ” bad,” “good,” and “likely” — for the planet and humanity in the Anthropocene.

Read the Synopsis.